Microsoft Solutions
Most organisations already own more Microsoft capability than they use.
ExploreCloud Services
Migration is the easy part. What determines whether cloud works for you is the design, the identity model, the cost controls and who watches it afterwards.
How it fits together
A lot of South African organisations moved to cloud quickly, and are now paying for it twice: once in monthly consumption they cannot fully explain, and again in the on-premises kit that never actually got decommissioned.
The diagram is illustrative. It shows the shape of the capability rather than any specific customer environment.
Overview
We start with a readiness assessment — what you run, what it depends on, what it costs today, and what genuinely benefits from moving. Some workloads belong in Azure. Some belong in a private or hosted environment for latency, licensing or data residency reasons. Some should stay exactly where they are until the hardware is due for refresh.
The output is a migration plan with sequencing, rollback positions and a cost model you can put in front of a CFO.
What changes
The point of the work, stated as results rather than product names.
Right-sizing, reservation planning and tagging so that consumption maps to departments and projects.
Entra ID, conditional access and MFA established before workloads move, not retrofitted afterwards.
Less capital tied up in equipment that ages, and fewer single points of failure in a server room.
Cloud backup and DR designed to stated RPO and RTO targets, with documented restore tests.
Capabilities
Capability areas we design, implement and support. Scope for any engagement is agreed and documented in writing.
Deciding what moves, in what order, and why.
Infrastructure and platform services in Azure.
The productivity and collaboration layer.
Running it after go-live.
How we deliver
Each stage produces something you can review before the next one starts.
Application and infrastructure inventory, dependency mapping and a current-state cost baseline.
Target architecture, identity model, network design, security controls and landing zone structure.
Staged migration by workload group, each with a test window, a cutover plan and a rollback position.
Post-migration review of cost, performance and security posture, then ongoing management.
Questions
No, and we will tell you when it is not. Cloud usually improves flexibility, resilience and time-to-provision. Whether it lowers cost depends on workload profile, licensing and how disciplined the environment stays afterwards. That comparison belongs in the assessment, before the decision.
Yes. Hybrid is a legitimate long-term architecture, not a halfway house. Line-of-business systems with licensing constraints or latency requirements often stay local while identity, email and collaboration move.
Data residency requirements are captured during assessment and drive region selection and service choice. Where a requirement cannot be met by a given service, we say so rather than working around it.
Whoever you want to. We can hand over a documented environment to your team, run it under a managed service, or split responsibilities under a co-managed model.
Related
Most organisations already own more Microsoft capability than they use.
ExploreEverything else is a scheduled job with a green tick.
ExploreWhen applications, data and users are spread across cloud and office, the only consistent control point left is who someone is and what they are allowed to reach.
ExploreTechnology trademarks and logos remain the property of their respective owners. Inclusion describes platforms supported in solution delivery and does not imply a specific partnership designation unless explicitly stated. See the full technology ecosystem.