Case Studies
Engagement formats rather than named client stories — because we do not publish client details without written approval.
Why this page looks like this
It is common for IT company websites to carry case studies with impressive percentages and anonymous clients. Some are real. Many are not, and procurement teams have learned to discount them.
What follows is a set of engagement templates: the situation we typically encounter, what the work involves, and the kind of result it produces. Where clients give written approval, named case studies with verified figures will replace them.
To confirmThese are engagement templates, not client stories. To publish real case studies, obtain written client approval covering the client name, the described situation and any figures quoted, then replace these cards.
Engagement formats
SITUATION
Ageing servers out of support, no capacity headroom, no refresh budget motivated.
ENGAGEMENT
Infrastructure health assessment, sized replacement platform, staged migration, documented handover.
TYPICAL RESULT
Consolidated hardware footprint, supported platform, five-year refresh plan.
SITUATION
On-premises Exchange at end of life; users on mismatched Office versions.
ENGAGEMENT
Tenant design, hybrid configuration, staged mailbox migration, device and client rollout.
TYPICAL RESULT
Single collaboration platform, mail flow migrated, MFA enforced at cutover.
SITUATION
Flat network, poor wireless coverage, no segmentation or monitoring.
ENGAGEMENT
Site survey, structured architecture, phased switch and access point deployment.
TYPICAL RESULT
Segmented network, documented topology, monitored performance.
SITUATION
Support handled reactively by an overloaded internal resource.
ENGAGEMENT
Discovery and documentation, monitoring deployment, staged transition to a co-managed model.
TYPICAL RESULT
Defined response targets, reduced repeat incidents, internal capacity released.
SITUATION
No posture baseline; MFA partially deployed; backup untested.
ENGAGEMENT
Security posture assessment, prioritised remediation, endpoint and email controls, monitoring.
TYPICAL RESULT
Documented exposure reduction, enforced MFA, verified recovery capability.
SITUATION
Hardware refresh due; unclear whether cloud is viable or affordable.
ENGAGEMENT
Readiness assessment, cost comparison, landing zone design, workload-by-workload migration.
TYPICAL RESULT
Hybrid target state, documented cost model, reduced on-premises footprint.
SITUATION
Backups running with no verification and no recovery objectives agreed.
ENGAGEMENT
Data classification, RPO/RTO workshop, immutable and offsite copies, restore testing.
TYPICAL RESULT
Agreed recovery targets, tested restores, audit-ready evidence.
SITUATION
Critical process running on a shared spreadsheet with no controls.
ENGAGEMENT
Requirements workshops, prototype, iterative build, integration with existing systems.
TYPICAL RESULT
Multi-user application with validation, audit trail and documented handover.
